<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 22 Well Done State Tourism Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/</link>
	<description>Web Design, Development, and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zella Isam</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-30983</link>
		<dc:creator>Zella Isam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-30983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for giving the useful, dependable, revealing as well as fun guidance on the topic to Emily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for giving the useful, dependable, revealing as well as fun guidance on the topic to Emily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-14600</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-14600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post and comments. Just to add an international dimension I&#039;d be interested to see how you think www.golakes.co.uk (which we built for Cumbria The Lake District - which of course is in England) compares with some great sites you&#039;ve identified. OK, its a smaller area geographically but a fantastic part of the world with tons to do (not that I&#039;m biased!) And pretty rich functionality online as well (definitely not biased!!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and comments. Just to add an international dimension I&#8217;d be interested to see how you think <a href="http://www.golakes.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.golakes.co.uk</a> (which we built for Cumbria The Lake District &#8211; which of course is in England) compares with some great sites you&#8217;ve identified. OK, its a smaller area geographically but a fantastic part of the world with tons to do (not that I&#8217;m biased!) And pretty rich functionality online as well (definitely not biased!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julz</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-7018</link>
		<dc:creator>Julz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-7018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s my browser, but the NY one needs more styling. It looks unfinished. Also, the source HTML is really sloppy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s my browser, but the NY one needs more styling. It looks unfinished. Also, the source HTML is really sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-6398</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-6398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Lori also. Pretty to look, but mostly unusable. They&#039;ve also got SEO problems. Do a google search for &quot;ohio family travel&quot; (minus the quotes). Your #1 site is ranked 6th, making it essentially invisible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lori also. Pretty to look, but mostly unusable. They&#8217;ve also got SEO problems. Do a google search for &#8220;ohio family travel&#8221; (minus the quotes). Your #1 site is ranked 6th, making it essentially invisible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-5288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-5288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Lori that many of these sites score low on usability.  Has anyone ranked these sites based on that criteria?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lori that many of these sites score low on usability.  Has anyone ranked these sites based on that criteria?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US State Tourism Web Site Design: Two Years On (Part 1) &#124; ClickLogin Web Design</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>US State Tourism Web Site Design: Two Years On (Part 1) &#124; ClickLogin Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] More recently, Sam Dunn did his own summary of 22 well designed state tourism web sites. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More recently, Sam Dunn did his own summary of 22 well designed state tourism web sites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-1309</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the designs of some of your top-ranked web sites are attractive, they are terrible from a standpoint of usability, i.e., trying to actually plan a trip. I tried several of them, and dropped off after less than 2 minutes because it was too difficult to find what I was looking for. Pretty wallpaper is worthless if the structure of the house isn&#039;t sound.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the designs of some of your top-ranked web sites are attractive, they are terrible from a standpoint of usability, i.e., trying to actually plan a trip. I tried several of them, and dropped off after less than 2 minutes because it was too difficult to find what I was looking for. Pretty wallpaper is worthless if the structure of the house isn&#8217;t sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagliga tips #01 &#124; Webbrelaterat</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagliga tips #01 &#124; Webbrelaterat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 22 Well Done State Tourism Websites  Dela med dig Digg / Delicious / StumbleUpon / Reddit [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 22 Well Done State Tourism Websites  Dela med dig Digg / Delicious / StumbleUpon / Reddit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Watson</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam, interestingly enough, I did a similar post almost exactly a year ago - http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000325.php . It&#039;s interesting to see how some of these sites have improved over the last 12 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, interestingly enough, I did a similar post almost exactly a year ago &#8211; <a href="http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000325.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000325.php</a> . It&#8217;s interesting to see how some of these sites have improved over the last 12 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Dunn</title>
		<link>http://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sean
I selected some of the more attention grabbing websites, the ones that had the wow factor. Although I will say again that some might disagree and it is my opinion here were some criteria:

1. I didn&#039;t feel like an overwhelming amount of information was being thrown at me, the page was laid out with plenty of white space to help digest and separate information.
2. Well done graphics, for instance W. Virgina - http://www.wvtourism.com/, is a little dated looking.
3. If the site intrigued me to actually make a visit.

Those were some key ones, among others. I offer other people to share their opinions as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean<br />
I selected some of the more attention grabbing websites, the ones that had the wow factor. Although I will say again that some might disagree and it is my opinion here were some criteria:</p>
<p>1. I didn&#8217;t feel like an overwhelming amount of information was being thrown at me, the page was laid out with plenty of white space to help digest and separate information.<br />
2. Well done graphics, for instance W. Virgina &#8211; <a href="http://www.wvtourism.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wvtourism.com/</a>, is a little dated looking.<br />
3. If the site intrigued me to actually make a visit.</p>
<p>Those were some key ones, among others. I offer other people to share their opinions as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 411/440 objects using disk: basic

Served from: buildinternet.com @ 2013-05-20 01:26:09 -->