Comments on: What NASA Can Teach You About Web Design

By: Dan at St. Louis SEO Zone

Dan at St. Louis SEO Zone — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 20:13:34 +0000

Excellent article…your points are well taken…It’s obvious Nasa has no problem with design but they had to articulate their content well in order to satisfy different types in the audience.

By: Estuardo Meléndez

Estuardo Meléndez — Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:43:10 +0000

YOUR EGGS

By: Estuardo Meléndez

Estuardo Meléndez — Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:42:52 +0000

MY EGGS

By: Estuardo Meléndez

Estuardo Meléndez — Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:41:28 +0000

WOW:::::::::MY EGG

By: php web development from india

php web development from india — Mon, 16 May 2011 13:15:31 +0000

There is a difference between making content understandable and dumbing it down to the point of nonsense. Having taught undergraduate astronomy and physics for nearly 18 years, I have evidence that NASA is guilty of the latter. Nonsense words like “gravity”, “microgravity”, and “escape velocity” are used by NASA with certain assumptions about what the consumer already knows, but those assumptions are wrong most of the time.

By: anxiety attacks treatment

anxiety attacks treatment — Mon, 16 May 2011 05:25:35 +0000

Nice factors…I might observe that as somebody who actually doesn’t comment to blogs a lot (the truth is, this may be my first submit), I don’t suppose the time period “lurker” is very flattering to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault at all, however perhaps the blogosphere might give you a greater, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that take pleasure in reading the posts.

By: Philosophy in web design: the good and far-fetched comparisons | MarkupFlux

Philosophy in web design: the good and far-fetched comparisons | MarkupFlux — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:13:19 +0000

[...] 1) What NASA Can Teach You About Web Design [...]

By: Php Web Development India

Php Web Development India — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:13:15 +0000

What a great Information about Nasa and related. We have really enjoyed the post.

By: Osvaldo M.

Osvaldo M. — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:14:23 +0000

@Joe regarding: “Finally, if a website doesn’t validate (this page doesn’t) against the W3C standards, I can’t take anything its “designer” says seriously”.
Just a thought i am having: I believe quite a good amount of the awarded websites (usually in advertising, but still in the majority of the online media) are not compliance with W3C standards, and many of them are done running in Flash and made by acclaimed designers… they rely on a single factor: “user experience”. I, as well as NASA, would happily spare users with IE6 or below and low internet connections in order to provide a site which is provides more of an experience than just “read on” content in order to keep a usual flock of returning users, instead of having a bunch of one time visitors… . To provide a few evidence of my ramblings: Go to http://www.webbyawards.com/, check out the websites and run them against w3c, i randomly tried 7 of the sites, all came out with errors… and i wouldn’t dare to say i wouldn’t take any of the designers in there seriously… I acknowledge W3C is a great resource for mainstream and global websites, but as professional experience have dictated me: it means nothing when you have yourself a target audience…

By: Osvaldo M.

Osvaldo M. — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:54:18 +0000

Totally agree with this article… I’m not much into space nor science but a while ago i needed footage from space for a video that i was making as part of a uni project. Sfter useless hours of google searchs and torrent downloads i decided to check out the NASA website and i found myself lost for a few hours in the website just clicking and browsing around. I found everything that i needed and a bunch of other interesting stuff for my project, definitely one interesting and well-designed website…